 | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —Simon Robinson
|
| | | (...) Yeah - religions can adapt. I don't think David Eaton is really correct to say that Christianity doesn't bend - it does - it just does so over a period of hundreds of years - rather than tens of years. Christianity has adapted tremendously (...) (25 years ago, 27-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | theism & atheism (was: Re: 22/7 & infinities) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) I would say that, yeah. Definitely. Atheism is a meme just as much as theism is. Moreover, atheism is a direct byproduct of theism. If theism had never evolved on this planet, then neither would have atheism. Theism can exist without atheism, (...) (25 years ago, 27-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: theism & atheism (was: Re: 22/7 & infinities) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | (...) IMO... In an all theistic world, theism probably wouldn't be called or thought of as theism. If all people believed in the existence of God from Day 1 and their offspring continued to do so, it would just be a way of life (and quite likely (...) (25 years ago, 28-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) That I shall grant. Christianity has changed a great deal. Perhaps it would be fairer to say that they are stubborn in change. As you said, it takes hundreds of years for change to come about-- it doesn't happen as rapidly as change may be (...) (25 years ago, 27-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
