To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18432
18431  |  18433
Subject: 
Re: "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the I
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:14:25 GMT
Viewed: 
4120 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> 
> > > Breaking my usual practice of ignoring you and your nonsense,
> > 
> > I find that comment a little disingenuous. To be honest, I wish you would just
> > ignore me.
> 
> To be honest I wish you wouldn't post on LUGNET(tm) at all, you're somewhere
> between extremely low value add, and significant negative value add. Once in
> a while you come up with an outside cite of some limited value but by and
> large your own comments range from uninsightful to inciteful. Usually
> tending toward the latter.

Give it rest. It's rather ironic that you don't see the irony in what you are
saying. This sort stuff should be taken to e-mail.


> 
> By and large I do manage to ignore you but when you're at your most
> egregious... it's hard.
> 
> > Call me on that if I’m wrong, otherwise I’d appreciate some clarification.
> 
> I'm comfortable that I found a cite that demonstrated that you were at least
> trying to insinuate the matter in question. That you managed to weasel word
> things so that you're technically not exactly matching what I said is,

Synopsis: You've admitted I was correct, and you were wrong. Furthermore;
you're not happy about it.

> if
> anything, a testimony to your own despicable debating techniques rather than
> any fault of my own.
> 
> My expectation is that you will twist this around further, as is your wont,

Give it rest. This sort stuff should be taken to e-mail.

> but I am done.


Scott A



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the I
 
(...) And it was so nice in here lately--things were debated, discussions happened, and there was almost a zen-like, albeit debatable discussions, in the land. Oh well, c'est la vie! Dave K. (24 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the IRA?
 
(...) To be honest I wish you wouldn't post on LUGNET(tm) at all, you're somewhere between extremely low value add, and significant negative value add. Once in a while you come up with an outside cite of some limited value but by and large your own (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

205 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR