To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18434
18433  |  18435
Subject: 
Re: "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the I
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:04:39 GMT
Viewed: 
4181 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > 
> > > > Breaking my usual practice of ignoring you and your nonsense,
> > > 
> > > I find that comment a little disingenuous. To be honest, I wish you would just
> > > ignore me.
> > 
> > To be honest I wish you wouldn't post on LUGNET(tm) at all, you're somewhere
> > between extremely low value add, and significant negative value add. Once in
> > a while you come up with an outside cite of some limited value but by and
> > large your own comments range from uninsightful to inciteful. Usually
> > tending toward the latter.
> 
> Give it rest. It's rather ironic that you don't see the irony in what you are
> saying. This sort stuff should be taken to e-mail.
> 
> 
> > 
> > By and large I do manage to ignore you but when you're at your most
> > egregious... it's hard.
> > 
> > > Call me on that if I’m wrong, otherwise I’d appreciate some clarification.
> > 
> > I'm comfortable that I found a cite that demonstrated that you were at least
> > trying to insinuate the matter in question. That you managed to weasel word
> > things so that you're technically not exactly matching what I said is,
> 
> Synopsis: You've admitted I was correct, and you were wrong. Furthermore;
> you're not happy about it.
> 
> > if
> > anything, a testimony to your own despicable debating techniques rather than
> > any fault of my own.
> > 
> > My expectation is that you will twist this around further, as is your wont,
> 
> Give it rest. This sort stuff should be taken to e-mail.
> 
> > but I am done.
> 
> 
> Scott A

And it was so nice in here lately--things were debated, discussions
happened, and there was almost a zen-like, albeit debatable discussions, in
the land.

Oh well, c'est la vie!

Dave K.



Message has 1 Reply:
  I agree.
 
We all need to respond to the issues raised, rather that insult each other. How come it's so busy here, I thought it was Thanksgiving yesterday? Scott A (24 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the I
 
(...) Give it rest. It's rather ironic that you don't see the irony in what you are saying. This sort stuff should be taken to e-mail. (...) Synopsis: You've admitted I was correct, and you were wrong. Furthermore; you're not happy about it. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

205 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR