To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18434
18433  |  18435
Subject: 
Re: "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the I
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:04:39 GMT
Viewed: 
2016 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

Breaking my usual practice of ignoring you and your nonsense,

I find that comment a little disingenuous. To be honest, I wish you would just
ignore me.

To be honest I wish you wouldn't post on LUGNET(tm) at all, you're somewhere
between extremely low value add, and significant negative value add. Once in
a while you come up with an outside cite of some limited value but by and
large your own comments range from uninsightful to inciteful. Usually
tending toward the latter.

Give it rest. It's rather ironic that you don't see the irony in what you are
saying. This sort stuff should be taken to e-mail.



By and large I do manage to ignore you but when you're at your most
egregious... it's hard.

Call me on that if I’m wrong, otherwise I’d appreciate some clarification.

I'm comfortable that I found a cite that demonstrated that you were at least
trying to insinuate the matter in question. That you managed to weasel word
things so that you're technically not exactly matching what I said is,

Synopsis: You've admitted I was correct, and you were wrong. Furthermore;
you're not happy about it.

if
anything, a testimony to your own despicable debating techniques rather than
any fault of my own.

My expectation is that you will twist this around further, as is your wont,

Give it rest. This sort stuff should be taken to e-mail.

but I am done.


Scott A

And it was so nice in here lately--things were debated, discussions
happened, and there was almost a zen-like, albeit debatable discussions, in
the land.

Oh well, c'est la vie!

Dave K.



Message has 1 Reply:
  I agree.
 
We all need to respond to the issues raised, rather that insult each other. How come it's so busy here, I thought it was Thanksgiving yesterday? Scott A (22 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the I
 
(...) Give it rest. It's rather ironic that you don't see the irony in what you are saying. This sort stuff should be taken to e-mail. (...) Synopsis: You've admitted I was correct, and you were wrong. Furthermore; you're not happy about it. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

205 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR