To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18282 (-5)
  Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid
 
(...) Yes. (...) I expect the cost would have been high, but worth paying. (...) Others have already. But if it matters to you, feel free to disprove it. (...) I think it is every bit as relevant as WW1. The USA continues to make bad decisions – (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid
 
(...) I'm not "anti-American", I'm pro-justice. Understand the difference. Scott A (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Buses & Beggers [Re: Vote against/for...]
 
(...) Not at all. Blacks *did* have serious civil rights issues. Most of the country has been able to get beyond simple racism. Today many blacks face many social and economic problems (as does everyone else!)-- but to continually blame racism is (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Buses & Beggers [Re: Vote against/for...]
 
(...) Why not? Why are millions well (...) You choose to dodge my question, so I'll ignore yours for the moment. Are you claiming that blacks haven't been put into a difficult position in the first place due to factors mentioned above? You may ask (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Buses & Beggers [Re: Vote against/for...]
 
(...) *Are* all blacks in the "less money" hole? Why not? Why are millions well off, dispite all of the things you mentioned? I am not trying to sweep all of those things under the rug; I am calling for people who use such arguments as excuses to (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR