Subject:
|
Re: Vote against/for...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 08:32:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2397 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > John, "responsible" is not the word I would use - name me a country that has a
> > worse record with nuclear, biological and chemical weapons?
>
> The former USSR.
Has it dropped "the bomb", has it used biological and chemical weapons the way
the USA has? I think not.
>
> > In the cold war,
> > the USA [and others] tried to destabilise many nations. Today, the USA funds
> > human rights abuses in Israel.
>
> You go, spin doctor. The cold war was a battle of idealogies-- Communism vs
> Capitalism. We won.
Not quite right, but does the means justify the end?
>
> As far as Israel goes, that is your POV and not fact; we just see things
> differently.
No john, it's a fact. You know. I know it. It's a fact.
Scott A
>
> -John
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) The USSR denotated plenty of nuclear bombs. Or did you mean killing people at the same time? Yeah, we dropped 2 nukes (tiny by today's standards), but reluctantly. Had we a cache of bombs we would most certainly have provided a little (...) (24 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) The former USSR. (...) You go, spin doctor. The cold war was a battle of idealogies-- Communism vs Capitalism. We won. As far as Israel goes, that is your POV and not fact; we just see things differently. -John (24 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
