Subject:
|
Re: Vote against/for...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 02:12:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
746 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> Interesting question / answer session:
> Q: Does Iraq have nuclear weapons capability?
> A: Probably (or close anyway), but not enough information.
> Q: Assuming they do, would they be prepared to use it in a war if they
> thought it justified?
> A: Probably, but not enough information.
> Now ask the same two questions about the US.
Now ask:
Q: Whose reasoning for use of nuclear weapons do you trust more-- Iraq or
the US?
A: ?
-John
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Well, since I've publically stated I think their reasoning in WWII was nothing short of terrorism anyway (lets not go there again), I'd have to say "neither", especially with dubya at the helm. Here's another question: Do you think that (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Interesting question / answer session: Q: Does Iraq have nuclear weapons capability? A: Probably (or close anyway), but not enough information. Q: Assuming they do, would they be prepared to use it in a war if they thought it justified? A: (...) (22 years ago, 10-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
