To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18204
18203  |  18205
Subject: 
Re: Vote against/for...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 22:56:53 GMT
Viewed: 
787 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:

Such as the terrorist act of laying waste to two whole cities, for example?

I know where you're going, Dave!  Don't go there! No one wants to rehash
THAT one! Plus LFB would be annoyed he missed it!

Interesting question / answer session:

Q: Does Iraq have nuclear weapons capability?

A: Probably (or close anyway), but not enough information.

Q: Assuming they do, would they be prepared to use it in a war if they thought
it justified?

A: Probably, but not enough information.

Now ask the same two questions about the US.

ROSCO



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Vote against/for...
 
(...) Now ask: Q: Whose reasoning for use of nuclear weapons do you trust more-- Iraq or the US? A: ? -John (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Vote against/for...
 
(...) I know where you're going, Dave! Don't go there! No one wants to rehash THAT one! Plus LFB would be annoyed he missed it! (you've got me humming "I think I'm turning Japanese" already so knock it off!) ++Lar (22 years ago, 8-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR