To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18168
18167  |  18169
Subject: 
Re: A word to the international community... (Re: Vote against/for...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 20:53:57 GMT
Viewed: 
2755 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> 
> > > Hmmm, then from where?
> > 
> >  You know--that dusty old book you believe to be the word of your god.
> 
> No, I think he was asking where YOU would get your morals... you reminded
> him where he gets his, which I presume he already knew.
> 
> We've discussed morality and the origins thereof in the past and I think I'm
> in the rather small minority that thinks one can have moral absolutes
> without having to have them imposed by an external source, and who therefore
> rejects moral relativism.
> 
> As an aside I do have some sympathy (i.e. I believe them all to be true)
> with the following views, none of which I find contradictory: (grouped
> together for convenience)
> 
> The US is not free.
> The US is the freeest country in the world.
> The US ought to be (a lot!) freer than it currently is.
> 
> The US is not perfect.
> The US is the best country in the world.
> The US ought to be (a lot!) better than it is.
> 
> The US does not always do the right thing internationally.
> The US has, more often than not, been a force for good in the world.
> The US ought to be more careful in how it acts, who it allies with and what
> sides it takes in international conflicts.
> The US is not, and should not be, the worlds policeman.
> The US has the right to act in its own self interest when events warrant it.
> The US has no imperial ambitions and should not have any, ever.
> 
> I know the "best" allegation may not go well with others. Tough. We ARE
> better than other countries and countries ought to aspire to be more like
> (the good parts of) our system.
> 
> That does not make me jingoistic or nationalistic.

I agree with you completely.  I would like to discuss with you sometime our
side discussion of joining the Republican party sometime (and I apologize to
you for my loser***n jab-- I was just tweaking:)  I was intrigued to learn that
you would find it somehow even remotely tolerable, given your liberatarian
views, to be in the Demo party as opposed to the Republican.  Personally, I
have a lot of liberatarian views, and I find myself way more in tune with the
GOP platform over the Dem one.

-John



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A word to the international community... (Re: Vote against/for...)
 
(...) I'm not sure I said that or left that impression. Although my wife does accuse me of being a closet Republican (...) It's not the platform thats so bad in the GOP case (after you cut about 50% away) it's the practice. (24 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A word to the international community... (Re: Vote against/for...)
 
(...) No, I think he was asking where YOU would get your morals... you reminded him where he gets his, which I presume he already knew. We've discussed morality and the origins thereof in the past and I think I'm in the rather small minority that (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR