To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18168
18167  |  18169
Subject: 
Re: A word to the international community... (Re: Vote against/for...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 20:53:57 GMT
Viewed: 
863 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:

Hmmm, then from where?

You know--that dusty old book you believe to be the word of your god.

No, I think he was asking where YOU would get your morals... you reminded
him where he gets his, which I presume he already knew.

We've discussed morality and the origins thereof in the past and I think I'm
in the rather small minority that thinks one can have moral absolutes
without having to have them imposed by an external source, and who therefore
rejects moral relativism.

As an aside I do have some sympathy (i.e. I believe them all to be true)
with the following views, none of which I find contradictory: (grouped
together for convenience)

The US is not free.
The US is the freeest country in the world.
The US ought to be (a lot!) freer than it currently is.

The US is not perfect.
The US is the best country in the world.
The US ought to be (a lot!) better than it is.

The US does not always do the right thing internationally.
The US has, more often than not, been a force for good in the world.
The US ought to be more careful in how it acts, who it allies with and what
sides it takes in international conflicts.
The US is not, and should not be, the worlds policeman.
The US has the right to act in its own self interest when events warrant it.
The US has no imperial ambitions and should not have any, ever.

I know the "best" allegation may not go well with others. Tough. We ARE
better than other countries and countries ought to aspire to be more like
(the good parts of) our system.

That does not make me jingoistic or nationalistic.

I agree with you completely.  I would like to discuss with you sometime our
side discussion of joining the Republican party sometime (and I apologize to
you for my loser***n jab-- I was just tweaking:)  I was intrigued to learn that
you would find it somehow even remotely tolerable, given your liberatarian
views, to be in the Demo party as opposed to the Republican.  Personally, I
have a lot of liberatarian views, and I find myself way more in tune with the
GOP platform over the Dem one.

-John



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A word to the international community... (Re: Vote against/for...)
 
(...) I'm not sure I said that or left that impression. Although my wife does accuse me of being a closet Republican (...) It's not the platform thats so bad in the GOP case (after you cut about 50% away) it's the practice. (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A word to the international community... (Re: Vote against/for...)
 
(...) No, I think he was asking where YOU would get your morals... you reminded him where he gets his, which I presume he already knew. We've discussed morality and the origins thereof in the past and I think I'm in the rather small minority that (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR