To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18161
18160  |  18162
Subject: 
Re: A word to the international community... (Re: Vote against/for...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:28:36 GMT
Viewed: 
825 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:

If I hear of one more Hollywood star say in a press conference in Europe that
they hate America, I'm think I'm going to puke!

Who has said this?  Name the star, and give the citation.

The quickest link I could find: http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/815250.asp?cp1=1

  Well, good for Jessica.  But she said "I hate Bush" and said nothing about
hating America.  Unless you modify your complaint, you are explicitly
equating Bush with America, which is insane nationalistic idolatry.  And,
frankly, that sort of kneejerk follow-the-leader thinking, not to mention
your anti-world diatribes here, also sometimes make me ashamed of America.
  Find an explicit example of a star who said "I hate America" or else
change your initial assertion.

The fact that you are unable to imagine a dissenting view by an
intelligent, well-motivated person of good character is a fantastic
indicator that you yourself are either of low intelligence or poor character
or both.

Dave!, tell me why I should care more about some Hollywood star's opinions than
anyone else's.

  I agree with you 100% that there's no reason at all to care more about
some actor's opinion than anyone else's.  So why did you single out
Hollywood stars for blame re: your desire to puke?
  But that's not the point.  You have stated outright that you judge a
dissenter to be less intelligent, of lesser character, or of ill motive
simply because that dissenter doesn't agree with you.  Is that your intent,
or are you being hopelessly imprecise once again?

The media seems to think that because they make films, their
opinions must be somehow more valid and so they give them press.  And what is
that intelligent opinion? "I hate Bush".  Very nice.  Let's report that,
because we hate Bush, too.  Whatever.

  You're being deliberately (I hope) simplistic.  The Republicans also have
their Hollywood pawns, such as Charleton Heston and Arnold Schwartzenegger
who are likewise given presstime to spout their views.  The difference here,
as always, is that you are accommodating of views that are in line with your
own, but you reject outright those views that conflict with yours.

So you're saying that no one in the world has a moral right to judge (ie,
to take a stand) except conservatives?  I would counter that everyone not
only has a moral right to judge others' actions; we all have a moral *duty*
do to so.  But the moral compass shouldn't be read straight out of a
two-millennium old book.

Hmmm, then from where?

  You know--that dusty old book you believe to be the word of your god.

At least I have a moral absolute; you have none, and
therefore you drift in a sea of moral relativism.  Any judgments you make
hoists you by your own petard.

  You *BELIEVE* that your morality is absolute, and I wonder why you believe
that.  Prove that it *is* absolute, and prove that you subscribe to it 100%,
and then maybe your statement will make you seem like less of a buffoon.
Anyway, my morality is not adrift, nor is it as arbitrary as you need to
believe it is.

Check out the articles linked from this post:

http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=18104

These are trying times I agree. Our freedoms are being assaulted from all
sides.

  But you're willing to forgive the assault when it comes from your pet
political party, though you condemn it when it originates with someone else.
Why?

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A word to the international community... (Re: Vote against/for...)
 
(...) No, I think he was asking where YOU would get your morals... you reminded him where he gets his, which I presume he already knew. We've discussed morality and the origins thereof in the past and I think I'm in the rather small minority that (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A word to the international community... (Re: Vote against/for...)
 
(...) The quickest link I could find: (URL) (...) Dave!, tell me why I should care more about some Hollywood star's opinions than anyone else's. The media seems to think that because they make films, their opinions must be somehow more valid and so (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR