 | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) Hey, "He who mentions Hitler first has lost the argument". Go right ahead! :-) Scott, c'mon. Stop and look at your answer. Here I accuse you of grinding an axe against the United States, and all you do is try to sharpen it further. Who do you (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) If you're a Tymbrini, there's got to be a practical joke coming here soon before we get to the denoument of this thread. :-) I can hardly wait! Speaking of practical jokes, did you ever notice that "Tymbrini" contains "Brin"? That has to have (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually, that's how it started. I even pointed out that many of my answers were hardly serious, or not even necessarily my own viewpoint. I just thought Scott's santimonious self-righteousness need a bit of puncturing. (...) Tymbrimi. No "n". (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) OK, stand in front of a mirror and say "Scott's santimonious self-righteousness" three times fast. (...) "n", "m"... Sound about the same and not a lot of difference pictorially(1). Just one hump. And whats just one hump between friends, I ask (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) <snip> I really don't know if I should post this link, first of all 'cause of the bad language factor, and it has to do with a little video game I play (yeah, my other hobby that takes (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) I find that comment a little full of "self-righteousness". :) Scott A (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: I point out that Scott meets everything with a new attack, and he proves me right yet again —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | (...) Hey, Ill submit to judgment by my peers. Maybe we should run a "Who is the most self-righteous" poll? ;-) Bruce (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) I agree!! Dave K -who is making his manilla folder bigger by the minute! (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) You are misrepresenting me. (...) I think you are wrong to feel safer. (...) Have I ever said they should be left in place? (...) No. Did I say that? (...) I'm not avoiding anything, you are jumping to conclusions and putting words in my (...) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) What part of this is becoming a Monty Python routine didn't you understand? The automatic gainsaying of whatever the other person said isn't an argument. You offer no support for your statements, while you leave support for mine right there (I (...) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | <snip> (...) You are misrepresenting me. (...) That's my informed opinion. (...) <snip> (...) Yeah. Yeah. Just keep jumping to conclusions. On 911 only one country on the planet was really talking to MO. About the 1st thing Bush did when he got out (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) So you *would* bother to attack somebody? I wouldn't, so yes, we are in disagreement. So much for your holier than thou stance. (and by "bother" it was pretty darn clear I was refering to attacking Iraq, so let me anticipate your mindless (...) (22 years ago, 28-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) You are putting words in my mouth again. (...) I was not referring to an attack. If you were, I misunderstood you. (...) A dodge? (...) You seem to be under the impression that I should jump through your hoops. I'm not trying to deceive (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I missed this. Is this really the best you can do? Are you saying that only "7.5 thousand pound bunker busters" were dropped and that airmen did not have to fly at altitude to avoid the Stingers the USA had given to the Afghans? Is this (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
