 | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Scott Arthur
| | | | (...) ...for how much of his track record did he have the support of the ‘West’? Did we act when he started gassing his own people? Was Bush Sr not willing to let his invasion of Q8 go with only mild rumblings until Thatcher convinced him (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) Notice how you never answer questions? That you just shift to a new attack? Iraq is not a destablizing force? Just say yes or no for once, and *then* append your explanations instead of this constant dodging. (...) Actually, yes, but not as (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Scott Arthur
| | | | | | (...) Really? I'm not aware we did? What was the USA's official response? How did it act? Educate me. I’m genuinely interested. Scott A (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Scott Arthur
| | | | | (...) I think I did. My point is that SH's track record can't be looked at in isolation.... he is of our making. He is trying to develop WoMD - that's bad. But what gives Bush, the president of a country with a colourful WoMD track record, a right (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
