Subject:
|
Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Sep 2002 05:34:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1029 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, William R. Ward writes:
>
> Let me say it again, but more concisely:
>
> Only an armed population can fight back against a totalitarian regime.
It depends what you mean by "fight". If it means oppose through force of
arms, then you are correct. Obviously.
If you mean only an armed population can rid themselves of a totalitarian
regime, then I think you are wrong.
Look at the experience of regime changes last century in India, East
Germany, Russia and South Africa which were achieved (primarily) other than
through force of arms.
Cheers
Richie Dulin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
| Let me say it again, but more concisely: Only an armed population can fight back against a totalitarian regime. The 2nd amendment is meant to allow the population to be armed for just this reason. Yes, if democracy failed and a totalitarian regime (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
