 | | Re: Averages and Capitalism (was Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) I don't accept that as a given. Too often pure socialist countries started off way down the ladder anyway, and are further weighted down by being dictatorships. (...) I think it is easier for socialists to take over capitalist countries with (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Averages and Capitalism (was Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | I actually think that everything Bruce wrote was spot on. Here's a couple snipets about which I want to comment. (...) Yup. Communal living is cool. It has been claimed to me that 40,000 Hopi lived under a single socialist government. Anyone know (...) (22 years ago, 18-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Averages and Capitalism (was Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, *obviously* they were savages. Actually, that factoid rings a bell, but I can't place it; I'm likewise interested in a confirmation. Dave! (22 years ago, 18-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Averages and Capitalism (was Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!) —David Koudys
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: <snip> (...) Again, in a perect world, this would work, but, as todays newspaper headlines tell us, and as numbers are crunched, we see the gulf between the richest of us and the poorest of us (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
