To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17573
17572  |  17574
Subject: 
Re: Averages and Capitalism (was Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:15:23 GMT
Viewed: 
3689 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richie Dulin writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > <snip>
> > > I disagree and I see no further proof necessary other than to point out that
> > > the closer one gets to a pure capitalist system the better off on average
> > > everyone is, and the closer one gets to a pure socialist system the worse
> > > off on average everyone is. That's pretty generally accepted, I think,
> > > because we have so much empirical proof all around us.
> > 
> > I'd generally accept that ;-).
> > 
> > But in accepting that, I have to accept that, as one gets closer and closer
> > to a pure capitalist system, there are more and more people who are worse
> > off than average.
> 
> That's not entirely accurate, but even if it was, it's not a good metric.
> The average standard of living in the US is significantly higher than, say,
> China.

Ok. Now say Sweeden... it's not below the US standards. And it's just as
much socialist as it is capitalist.

> I don't tend to agree with Larry on political ideals, but as a goverment
> moves closer to pure socialism, the potential abuse becomes greater.  This
> is not to say that socialism is more prone to abuse than capitalism, but
> that abuse in a pure socialist system is farther reaching.  It is easier to
> become a tinpot dictator coming from a socialist gov't than a capitalist one.

That's absurd.
Was there at any point in history a nation which *democratically* chose
socialism, and later had a socialist dictatorship? No. There are however
numerous cases of dictators who nominally adopted socialism *after* they
seized power, or in order to do it - but that's a whole different matter.


Pedro



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Averages and Capitalism (was Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!)
 
(...) A socialist gov't is more prone to being victimized by a dictatorship or ruling class because a significantly larger percentage of the power in the system rests with the government. In a capitalist system the would-be dictators become CEOs (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Averages and Capitalism (was Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!)
 
(...) That's not entirely accurate, but even if it was, it's not a good metric. The average standard of living in the US is significantly higher than, say, China. I don't tend to agree with Larry on political ideals, but as a goverment moves closer (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR