To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17384
17383  |  17385
Subject: 
Re: Instant Runoff Voting
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 8 Aug 2002 04:44:31 GMT
Viewed: 
302 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jude Beaudin writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
See
http://www.AlaskansforVotersRights.com/
for more info on a ballot proposal on the Alaska Primary that will do much
to give people more choice at less expense. The Alaska LP supports this
which is how I heard about it.

Instant Runoff means that when you vote you also give second, third, etc
choices so if there is no clear winner in the first round, some candidates
are eliminated and the ballots cast for them are reevaluated for second,
third, etc choices to see if a majority is now achieved.

This is believed to defuse the "wasted vote" charge (to a certain extent)
that dogs minor parties in the US.

In a perfect world it would work. But I doubt people would not readily
accept that type of voting because you have to think of how you fill out the
ballot.

Yes, perish the thought, voters actually being asked to think! Grin.

Also, you still end up with situations of people purposely spoiling
ballots, i.e. picking the same candidate for all choices.

That's a spoiled ballot anyway, no different than now.


Although, it does give me an idea for the next Space Contest...

Good!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Instant Runoff Voting
 
(...) Surely it is actually still a vote until that candidate is chucked out. It is no different to only writing in the first choice and leaving the rest blank. This method is the way my University (and I think all UK Universities) elect Sabbatical (...) (22 years ago, 8-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Instant Runoff Voting
 
(...) In a perfect world it would work. But I doubt people would not readily accept that type of voting because you have to think of how you fill out the ballot. Also, you still end up with situations of people purposely spoiling ballots, i.e. (...) (22 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR