Subject:
|
Re: tolerant morals are a blueprint to disaster (but I don't force a change)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:09:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5432 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> > > >
> > > > > Nailing your neighbours wife is not morally right, even if you, your
> > > > > neighbours wife and your neighbours wife's husband think it's okay.
> > > >
> > > > Why not? You'll have to present an argument other than "from authority" to
> > > > convince me differently.
> > >
> > > STD
> >
> > Not a moral reason not to...
>
> ...except in a very esotaric sense that taking action to prevent harmful
> diseases is life-affirming.
I already said there are "no other stakeholders". If one of the participants
has an STD, there are other stakeholders. Nice try though.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
225 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
