Subject:
|
Re: tolerant morals are a blueprint to disaster (but I don't force a change)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 22:47:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2480 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> > >
> > > > Nailing your neighbours wife is not morally right, even if you, your
> > > > neighbours wife and your neighbours wife's husband think it's okay.
> > >
> > > Why not? You'll have to present an argument other than "from authority" to
> > > convince me differently.
> >
> > Forgetting authority, forget the laws of the land and forget the laws of the
> > bible nad foget that I'm a Christian and that you're, well, not...
> >
> > Thank you for making my point so crystal clear.
> >
> > (and the following point does *not* make Christians exempt for we are, *all*
> > of us, sinners)
> >
> > STD
>
> Not a moral reason not to...
...except in a very esotaric sense that taking action to prevent harmful
diseases is life-affirming.
<GD&R> :)
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
225 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
