| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> > > No, I mean the God who lets -- or makes, bad things happen to good people.
> >
> > You mean like requiring of his own son that he sacrifice himself on the
> > cross to redeem the world? Sounds like a baby-eating fire-god to me. Yahweh
> > or Moloch -- you decide? Then again, what's the difference?
>
> Or it sounds as if it's the only way to redeem a fallen world (fallen due to
> us, btw), and the only way we have any hope of gaining forgiveness.
"Only way?!?!" Aren't we talking about Big-G God here? The "only way" an
infinite being can do something is however it wants to! And if that's not
the case, then I can think of something greater than "a God who can't do
things any way He wants," so...
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: slight
|
| (...) I have stated many times that *my* form of Christianity takes the form of leaving you to run your life the way you want as long as you reciprocate. It's the phrasing 'wacko Xtian' (and related spelling and ideas) which kinda started this whole (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
225 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
