| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> But Chris, if nothing else, I think we all have ageed that science
> cannot speak to such matters, so your requiring evidence to support
> a belief in God is flawed reasoning.
I didn't say anything about science. Science is not the lone venue for
evidence. Law, for instance, depends on evidence. In fact, I'd say that all
plausibly reasoned decision making proceses have a role for evidence.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: slight
|
| (...) Okay, I may have jumped the gun here. Would you provide an example of evidence (hypothetically speaking if necessary) which would lead you to believe in the existence of a God? -John (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: slight
|
| (...) But Chris, if nothing else, I think we all have ageed that science cannot speak to such matters, so your requiring evidence to support a belief in God is flawed reasoning. -John (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
225 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
