| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> But it is my contention that you, along with other atheists, will not believe
> in the existence of a Creator God because of pride and convenience. If not,
> maybe you might share why (because I *know* that it couldn't be *proven* to
> you).
Hasn't it ever been "shared" with you before?
I don't believe in any god because there is not a reasonable body of evidence
to support such belief.
When you've been deeply indoctrinated, or when the Lord has whispered into your
heart, you don't need evidence. I accept that. But neither has happened to
me. I was left to make my own choices and I do so based on my perception and
understanding of reality. It's pretty simple, really.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: slight
|
| (...) But Chris, if nothing else, I think we all have ageed that science cannot speak to such matters, so your requiring evidence to support a belief in God is flawed reasoning. -John (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: slight
|
| (...) I choose the *perception* that He is a tinpot dictator of a god, which is a misperception. God is unchanging, and God's true nature was revealed by Jesus life and teachings. Since that nature is that of a loving and just God, this is how I (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
225 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
