To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16829
16828  |  16830
Subject: 
Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 20:26:58 GMT
Viewed: 
3324 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:

Saying that Dubya cannot say 'God' either as himself or as his position
because it goes contrary to the separation of C & S is ludicrous at best.
Dubya has the freedom to say as he pleases--that's what the little blurb
from the WW was a bout, as well as your own Freedom of Speech.

  Freedom of Speech can be restricted by requirements of circumstance and
profession.  If W announced that we were about to obliterate Canada with
nuclear bombardment and said that we've just launched the missiles, would
you say "oh, that's just a guy exercising his Free Speech" or would you
expect the United States to issue some sort of explanation.  In my job I'm
not free to discuss certain matters with non-employees; that's not
un-Constitutional; that's protection of privileged material.  Even here on
LUGNET some people are in possession of sensitive LEGO-related information
that they're not free to divulge.

About the pledge--it's not the issue--the issue there is bullies.  Was it
the Pledge who beat up the kids at recess?  Was it the Pledge that threw the
first punch?

  You're caricaturing; the issue is that the State, in the form of The
School, enforces policy.  The School (ie, the State) is the bully. To reduce
it to a playground brawl is either to attack a straw man or else a serious
misunderstanding of the issue.

I wore a cub scout uniform to school every Tuesday, for my cub meeting was
after school down at the park.  Did wearing the uniform cause some grief in
class and/or on the playground?  Sure, but in the grande scheme of things...
whatever...

But that's no good in real life.  I know a guy who lost both legs in an
industrial accident; does that mean that no one who still has legs has a
right to complain when they hurt?  If your logic is correct, all we need to
do is find the person who's suffered the most, and the rest of us can all
shut up.

This reminds me of a Calvin & Hobbes cartoon, when Calvin put
on his dad's glasses, walked into the living room and said 'Calvin, go do
something you hate--it builds character' in his best dad's voice.  I always
loved that strip.

  Cartoons and primetime melodramas forming your understanding of US
national policy; what goes on above the border?!?  8^)

Appealing to athiests by taking the word 'God' out of institutional
vocabulary [raises no bar].

Again, you're mischaracterizing the issue.  It's not "athiests vs.
Christians."  It's people who favor separation of church and State vs.
people who don't object to State endorsement of religion.

     Dave!



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) Even here on (...) I'm going to forgive your foray off-topic in this NG just this once if you tell us and tell us NOW who knows what:-) (...) I would say that your characterization is slightly off-- should be whether the inclusion of "under (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) I know about shouting 'Fire!' in a crowded Theatre arguement--don't get bogged down in semantics. (...) And you're getting bogged down in semantics and slippery slopes--if you're afraid that your kid's going to get beat up 'cause he or she's (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
Oh I hate when this happens--I had a most beautiful resonse in the making and I accidentally closed explorer!! Grr!!! K, here goes--take 2 Using West Wing for a basis of research on politics is like using Pretty Woman for the basis of reasearch on (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR