Debate : 16711


Off-Topic / Debate / 16711	16710 \| 16712

Subject:	Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 27 Jun 2002 17:32:09 GMT
Viewed:	1676 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes: > > That said, I'm going to sing '..God keep our land, Glorious and Free...' > > with a little more emphasis from now on, and I'll fight to keep that line in > > there with everything I have. > > Do it! Sing your songs and keep "under God" in your renditions of The > Pledge. Just don't pretend that The State is entitled to endorse one > religion over another (or over a lack of religion). I'm confused. I thought David Koudys more likely to sing "God Save Our Gracious Queen" than "My Country Tis of Thee" but I could be wrong. Or is it that he just went to college in CA but is a US citizen after all? I admit it. I can't keep all these Daves straight without a scorecard. Especially you, Dave! Maybe there's only one Dave and you're arguing with yourself? Who can say? We have already established there is only one Eric.

Message has 3 Replies:

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) I wouldn't have expected you to want to keep anyone straight...What do you care? Chris FUT lugnet.off-topic.out...ext-quotes (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) That line of mine is from 'Oh Canada' Sometimes when I'm debating, I jump from one side of hte border to the other 'cause invariably, the stupidity that happens to our bigger brother, will eventually happen to us, though always on a much (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) He's figured us out. Ah well, it was fun while it lasted. DaveE (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) You only perceive it as a slippery slope because you're heavily invested in your particular deity. That's your right, obviously, but that doesn't mean The State can endorse a deity. To an athiest, an agnostic, a humanist, or even to someone (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search