Debate : 16610


Off-Topic / Debate / 16610	16609 \| 16611

Subject:	Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup? (everyone’s overreacting!)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Fri, 14 Jun 2002 17:53:41 GMT
Viewed:	33 times

~O.K. now everyone’s overreacting! Lugnet is looking out for it’s best interests… Lego is looking out for it’s best interest… And I'm sure FBTB is doin’ the same thing too… But before anybody does anything rash lets just take a step back and reflect on the situation for the sake of clarity. Changes and concessions can always be made…just don’t walk away from the table before proper lines of communication can be established. Nobody should just pull-out or get defensive at the immediacy of this moment. But this was a tad bit uncalled for… > In lugnet.lego.direct, Tim Saupé writes: > Everyone who has been telling me that LUGNET is going downhill was correct. Conversely, I've heard lots of negative stuff about FBTB. (for example your coverage of that toy fair event…when you “dropped the ball”) But I didn’t just give-up on you, I understood that as an individual you had certain personal issues regarding the matters at hand. And in the end things returned to normal. > To whomever it may concern If you should have any measure of trepidation regarding the situation, shouldn’t you give Suz the respect to discuss the matter personally via e-mail. And not just go by second-hand info? “Everyone who has been telling me - Tim” > Disgusted, Rather harsh term isn’t it, Has Suz EVER came to ‘your’ forum and FLAMED at you?!? Perhaps we can all find a more relative tone for our future discussions. ¤Sincerely, --==RïçhårÐ==--

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup? (everyone’s overreacting!)
In response to your comment Richard, Although harsh, I think that it is fair for Tim to be disgusted. Tim approached the situation diplomatically, (even though the intial comment was not intended at him, it still affected him and his website a great (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
Sad. To see the supposed 'Center of the LEGO Online Community' adopt such tactics and immaturity over an issue that should have been dealt with in email in the first place shows one thing clearly to me: Everyone who has been telling me that LUGNET (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars) !

134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search