To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16439
    Re: Poor Target.... —David Eaton
   (...) Agree 100% :) My guess is they're mad at him for "getting away with it". Something like: "I couldn't bring myself to do that as it's against my moral sense, and I, as a result, think that nobody should be ABLE to get away with it. So I'm mad (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
   
        Re: Poor Target.... —Dave Schuler
   (...) Not necessarily true at all, and it would be somewhat narrow and narcissistic of a person to decry only that which he could not bring himself to get away with. The reason I abhor murder has nothing to do with the likelihood that I'd get caught (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
   
        Re: Poor Target.... —David Eaton
     (...) Actually, I misspoke, but I'm not sure that's entirely your grievance with my post anyway. Rephrase above to "My guess is they're *also* mad at him..." Not to imply that people aren't mad for other reasons, which I think they are. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: Poor Target.... —Dave Schuler
     (...) I agree with you--if I'm writing a novel, I can "conceive" of any number of ways to commit fraud or theft or murder, but in itself that's no wrongdoing. Though I suppose that, if I commit any of those acts, my pre-planning might incriminate (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: Poor Target.... —Joseph Williams
      (...) Congratulations to everyone concerned in regards to their congnitive deducing skills. I had to read half the thread before I had fully figured out what Matt had done and some had already flamed him in the first few posts!! Not much to add here (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
     
          Re: Poor Target.... —Matt Sekerak
      I love you guys. Well, it's been real...back to work. But first I gotta go return my Gunship at KayBee! Just kidding =) I feel good today, hope everyone else does, too. -Matt . (23 years ago, 25-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: Poor Target.... —Ross Crawford
     (...) But it could be illegal just publishing the novel. Just look at the DVD CCA / MPAA case against DeCSS. ROSCO (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: Poor Target.... —Ray Sanders
   (...) Pesonally, I don't appreciate the braggadocio aspect of the original post. However, heres a counter example (hypothetical of course)... Suppose someone takes the Target ad into a WalMart and asks "see this ad, will you match Target's price ?" (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR