Subject:
|
Re: Returning stuff to Comp USA
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 May 2002 20:25:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
174 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> Anyhow, my point is, it's quite possible that the 'no receipt' policy
> isn't just a nicety for customer convenience, but is a marketing
> strategy for getting spenders in the store - hoping they'll spend some
> extra $, or never use their credit slip, or grow accustomed to arriving
> at their door rather than someone else's.
Y'know, this is the kind of post that really ticks me off! It's
well-reasoned, supported by anecdotal evidence and interesting marketing
theory, and stated in a focused and concise manner.
What is this statement doing in debate!!!
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Returning stuff to Comp USA
|
| (...) Yeah. Suz, no offense, but you have no future in .debate if you're going to be coherent. Sheesh. ;) Actually, I've kept silent in the debate, because I'm of two minds-- yes, it's fraudulent, but in fact they've anticipated it and still do not (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Returning stuff to Comp USA
|
| Hi folks! uh, I'm kinda new here.. (in fact, I think this is my first non-follow-up post to o.t.d) I'm not at all interested in debating anything with anyone. BUT, as far as I noticed, no one mentioned something that, I think, puts a little (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
