Subject:
|
Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 23:05:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1432 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999 23:14:52 GMT, "Simon Robinson"
<simon@simonrobinson.com> wrote:
<snip child deserves a mother and a father>
> Hmmm - I have to admit to being impressed there. That's about the first
> time I can ever remember seeing someone write down a reason for
> gay couples not adopting which sounds vaguely plausible, thought out,
> and not just based on quoting a mindless prejudice against gays.
You've never heard _that_ old tired argument before? I've been beaten
around the head with it so often it's getting very old.
Thing is, I don't believe that there are ways a female can care for a
child that a man can't, or vice versa. There are also plenty of het
couples that wouldn't know how to raise a baby if it appeared in their
birth canal and started shitting under the communal bed.
The stereotypical gay couple has a mother and a father who both happen
to be male. The stereotypical hetero family has a male who doesn't
care about the kids one way or the other and a crack whore.
Jasper "Fanning the flames" Janssen
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
| (...) matter (...) man (...) just (...) Hmmm - I have to admit to being impressed there. That's about the first time I can ever remember seeing someone write down a reason for gay couples not adopting which sounds vaguely plausible, thought out, and (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
