 | | Re: Scariness (was Re: Conflict in the Middle East) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) Perhaps you could explain this a little more so that the "wisdom" may be appreciated? (...) Perhaps you could explain (as I think nobody else has despite requests) why it is so disturbing? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Scariness (was Re: Conflict in the Middle East) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) quoteth James (...) Victory can bring us peace? What, at the annihilation of one side or the other? True, that's peace, since you now have no one that disagrees with you. Further, if you think victory doesn't necessitate a complete total party (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Scariness (was Re: Conflict in the Middle East) —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) I said *think* about it. Think of major conflicts and how they were eventually resolved. (...) Well, it's pretty self-evident IMO. If you don't realize it right away, I doubt any amount of explanation would help you understand anyway. -John (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Scariness (was Re: Conflict in the Middle East) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) And since this topic/discussion/issue is so convoluted to begin with, *not* clarifying what a person meant will really help the situation. True understanding comes with discourse, thru talking about it, with listening to other people's POV. (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Scariness (was Re: Conflict in the Middle East) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) :-O Scott A (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
