 | | Re: The value of reading (was: If you could leave any book on Kjeld's nightstand...) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Allan Bedford writes: <snip> I'm starting to realise something... Maybe should have realised it sooner. Perhaps we need a disclaimer from you. (or you from us) If I get the sense of what I snipped away, what you do when (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The value of reading (was: If you could leave any book on Kjeld's nightstand...) —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | | (...) The charter of the group reads as follows: "lugnet.off-topic.debate– Off-topic (non-LEGO®) discussions: debates, controversies, etc." Although it's called .debate, I had always thought that there was room for open personal discussions within (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The value of reading (was: If you could leave any book on Kjeld's nightstand...) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) No, do NOT do that! My post was to try to clear up some confusion on my part (and perhaps others) on where you are coming from, and build a new basis for constructive dialog. If you take away from that the idea that I'm thinking you should not (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The value of reading (was: If you could leave any book on Kjeld's nightstand...) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Hmmm...I think these are all very closely related ideas. Yes, debate has a specific meaning -- but classically, formal arguments are comprised of appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos. To use non-greek terms, a formal argument appeals to one's (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
