Subject:
|
Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:47:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
203 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> This is what I thought 'begs the question' inferred.
By the way, an "inference" is traditionally made by the person who's doing
the reading/listening/interpreting. You're thinking of "implied," which is
done by the person/thing making the statement.
Person A: Are you implying that I'm stingy?
Person B: Of course not! Why do you infer
that to be my intent?
These aren't iron-clad differences, but in formal use the distinction is
preferred.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe
|
| (...) Never let it be said you can't learn something from LUGNET. I always thought one of the meanings of 'inferred' meant 'related to', like the inherent properties thereof. such as 'I thought that this particular thing inferred that'--read as--'I (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe
|
| (...) Not that I'm an expert on grammar, but my entire life 'begs the question' meant to expound on the previous thought with a question... let me see if I can make a Daveish scenario... Person 1 "I think that your interest in LEGO is too extreme." (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
