Subject:
|
Re: An armed society...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:09:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1162 times
|
| |
|
|
> > My point being that to consider it "a necessary evil and be done with it"
> > discounts the possibility of it ever changing, and that would be pretty
> > short-sighted, even for US citizens.
>
> Head-on disagreement here. I think it would be short-sighted for anyone not
> bearing arms to think of themselves as being free. It is said that "freemen
> bear arms" because it is both a freedom and duty of one that wishes to
> remain free.
What if a society is mature enough to decide that guns have no place in the
community? Is that society no longer "free"?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Of course they're still free... until someone comes and takes that freedom away. Then those "free" people might wish they had the means to keep that freedom. (22 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Well, there is stuff that is covered by the federal government to make trade and travel amongst the many states more or less an easy thing -- one of the true limited purposes of the U.S. federal govt. I have no problems with any of that. But (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) !
|
179 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
