Subject:
|
Re: An armed society...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:35:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1303 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> And there's more, but I'll spare you. If you want to see it, go to:
>
> http://www.uh.edu/~dbarclay/rm/time.htm
OK, I did. In 1977 it lists "In Moore v. East Cleveland, the U.S. Supreme
Court rules that the right to keep and bear arms is specifically guaranteed in
the U.S. Constitution."
What does that mean? It seems self-evident and not something on which the
court would need to rule. So I assume it means something more.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Ah, the dangers of abridged source material. I found a more extensive discussion of that case at: (URL) appears that the case involved due process and the right to use one's property (in this case, residence) as one sees fit, as is spelled out (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Well, there is stuff that is covered by the federal government to make trade and travel amongst the many states more or less an easy thing -- one of the true limited purposes of the U.S. federal govt. I have no problems with any of that. But (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) !
|
179 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
