To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15245
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) My opinion. (...) And I don't want filth in the eye of my or anyone else's child. (...) Please cite examples, or are you speaking hypothetically? (...) Come again? Porn has *everything* to do with money and nothing to do with creativity. There (...) (22 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
John, first of all, I owe you a thanks. I was kind of excited by your tone in some notes and I wrote more hotly than was wise. You either didn't take it that way or only calmly replied. Thanks. (...) But I'm saying that it might not _be_ filth in my (...) (22 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) Why not? It is only by exposure to all kinds of stimuli that children are able to understand and begin to make sense of the world around them. (...) This is false. Eroticism is part of what it is to be human. If you want to shut off that part (...) (22 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) lol Well I came in a little strong, and so now I'm trying to tone down:-) (...) But you agree that at some point it *could* be. (...) hehe I know nothing about the porn industry, except that I hear it's huge, and that it's largely due to the (...) (22 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) Richard, do you think there are any ideas or images to which access should be prevented or restricted? I was once offended by an afternoon TV show about coprophilia at the perfect time for kids to come home from school and flip on the TV. I am (...) (22 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes: <snip> (...) Yah, no kidding. I want to chime in here for a bit. What *is* the big deal about this? I thought the government was supposed to be seperate from the church, yet it seems that most (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
First, let me say that I have not so far in my own life ever had a child. I may never have a child. So perhaps you may think I don't have an educated opinion. In fact, most of my views come from how I was raised. So really, if you have a beef with (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) You will also find that many people who act so liberal about it get very uncomfortable to see a woman breastfeeding a baby over six or eight months old, say. Yet in many cultures (and presumably in ours at one time) children breastfeed for a (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) old, (...) I know four people (two unrelated Africans and two sibling Americans) who breastfed to either 4 or 5. They recall suckling at their mother's teat. My first reaction was to think that would be very odd. But I'm sure they all have (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) Rather narrow-minded opinion at that. (...) Ah, now that's your right... (...) Now here, you need to BUTT OUT! Quit forcing your narrow-minded morality on everyone else. (...) Quality film-MAKING has nothing to do with the content. Is that so (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
Forgive me for jumping in late here, but I haven't been hanging around .debate much the past few days... (...) And at some point it *could* be the finest piece of art ever crafted by humankind; *that* is the point at which we should decide. To (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) Well, true significance of a work of art is often only realized until after an artist's death. My point is that if Jason is linking to *all* submissions to his site; it won't take long for some idiot to submit something that even Jason will (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) is (...) No. If he wants support from LEGO, then probably, he will have to be more selective (editorial/censorshipish, however you want to define it). However, if Jason is willing to forgo the actual financial support of LEGO, then he should (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) Okay, I am not sure who the anarchist is, but you seem to have a strange view concerning the defense of freedom of speech and expression. Defending freedom of speech generally means defending the right of anyone to express whatever (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) True. But, so? Instances of significant artistic achievement have also often been branded as pornographic for a time. That seems more apropos to the discussion. You wrote "Avant garde. Ptooey." in an earlier note, but what about the avant (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR