 | | Re: What happened? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) It HAS the resources, if you're referring to the one I think you are. But it spends them on grand cathedrals and imposing monasteries rather than on helping the poor. (...) Right, far easier to be self righteously charitable with other (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | The Ozarks (was: Re: What happened?) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) What? I've never been to Springfield (though they do have the region's best wine shop, so I keep meaning to go) but I've looked at maps and I'd think it was inside the range of Ozarks near the Western edge. What do you mean? Most of Southern (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Ozarks (was: Re: What happened?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Based on what else I saw, there's a scary thought. :-) (...) It's the Ozark MOUNTAINS, right? I didn't see anything higher than a slight hill while I was in Springfield. Hence my gibe. (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Ozarks (was: Re: What happened?) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Gotcha. Sorry for my density. They were once mountains...biguns too...at least that's what they tell us. (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
