To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14674
14673  |  14675
Subject: 
Re: One of my issues with the god of the old testament
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 20:23:09 GMT
Viewed: 
871 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:

Just jumping in for James, my guess is that he'd say that it's akin to
mathematics. God can't suddenly make 1==2 or 3+9=234. Humans "invented"
the basic rules mathematics, and the rest is true based on those rules, no
matter what. To take away the basics would no longer be "math". [L]ikewise he
says that morality is an inherent function of conscious (and maybe lesser?)
living beings. To change morality would be to make us not alive and/or not
conscious. So while God (now I may very well be overstepping my estimation of
James' point) may be able to change/create morality by shaping the basic rules
of what we are (insofar as we are "alive" or not), He can't change morality but
leave our consciousness untouched, because morality is based on it. Make sense?

  Sort of, but I'm not sure that I agree with it. Why should an infinite
being be constrained by our notions of impossibility, even if those notions
seem absolute to us?  I'm also not sure about the practical equivalence of
math and morality: our understanding of mathematics is undeniably a creation
of man, but I would argue that it describes something demonstrably and
fundamentally external to man; our concept of morality is undeniably a
creation of man, but I would argue that it describes something that can't be
as readily demonstrated to be external to man.
  And in any case, we're still left with the ability to conceive a being
greater than God--namely, a being that can perform a logical impossibility.

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: One of my issues with the god of the old testament
 
(...) I dunno. What makes you so sure that he shouldn't be? Is it a logical fallacy to say that he shouldn't be? Is there a flaw with such a belief that makes it invalid? (...) Demonstrated, no. At least not within our abilities. But again, is there (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: One of my issues with the god of the old testament
 
(...) Just jumping in for James, my guess is that he'd say that it's akin to mathematics. God can't suddenly make 1==2 or 3+9=234. Humans "invented" the basic rules mathematics, and the rest is true based on those rules, no matter what. To take away (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR