Subject:
|
Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:22:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
607 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> And of course, well-tempered comments are generally the quickest way
> to quash flame fests...
Thanks for the tip. Haven't seen it work that way here, though.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
| (...) No, I don't think you'd ever notice the trend in any sort of public forum, because while it works, the most common reply to a flame is to flame back. I've kind of noticed that in o-t.debate-- a rather alarming number of the regulars quite (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
| (...) Well, the thing that's wrong with that is the fact that there's nothing *but* connotation there. Being a "bonehead" is sufficiently without good definition, whereas a "troll" post has a definition as well as a connotation. If Jeremy only used (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
