To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14422
14421  |  14423
Subject: 
Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:29:51 GMT
Viewed: 
890 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Low writes:

I think the ethicists are way behind the eight
ball on this.
My tips, and you heard it here first:
2002: designer human v1.0
  tested for genetic abnormalities, gender in vitro
2003: first cloned human being born
2004: designer humanoid v1.0
  nonhuman DNA incorporated in a viable human embryo
2005: first fatherless girl born
2006: genetic therapy in post-natal humans begins
2007: designer human v2.0
  selected for intelligence, attractiveness etc
2009: designer human v2.5
  this tiime selection for traits actually works
2012: designer human v3.0
  gene therapy in utero, both on clones and naturals where necessary
  in vitro selected naturals comprise 10% of births
2013: designer humanoid v2.0
  first humanoids born with a partially non-human phenotype (super strength)
2015: designer human v4.0
complete control over recombination: any combination of parents possible
2020: artificial womb
  first motherless children born
2025: post-natal genetic manipulation for non-therapeutic purposes

God, how I hope you're right!  But I'm less optimistic than you.

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
 
(...) I don't really think it's cause for "optimism" -- in my book the longer it takes before genetic manipulation of humans is commonplace the better! But a lot of these processes are technologically feasible today, which is why I put such a short (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
 
(...) I understood Larry's point differently, in that optimistically we might never go extinct (technology propelling us beyond the earth, the solar system, the galaxy, the universe...), but in terms of biological evolution we're more or less at a (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR