To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14369
14368  |  14370
Subject: 
Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 28 Oct 2001 18:02:28 GMT
Viewed: 
979 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Powell writes:
> > Grow up, people. Steam lost. It costs too much.
> 
> Hardly.  So what...it costs more than diesel for maintance, and since US
> railways are profit orented, that's what they use (well, for the most part...I
> could name a few US railways that use steam, although I cannot think of any
> which are exclusively steam).

I belive Grand Canyon Railway is.
Josh

  Used correctly, modern steam would be cheaper
> than diesel to run (you don't believe me?  Check out what was written about the
> ACE engines in ~1982- 614T was cheaper to fuel than a diesel, and it was NOT
> working right by the end of the testing...).  Steam would also be cheaper to
> buy (historically, steam ran to about 1/5th of the price of diesel...)- the big
> bugaboo is maintance.  Fuel wasted when idling is not a big concern, when was
> the last time you saw a diesel shut down?
> 
> The problems of steam are a lack of MU ability, and the use of 100-150 year old
> ideas of maintance.  I believe that it is certanly possible to make economic
> use of coal via a railway engine, rather than oil-either directly, or
> indrectly.
> 
> James P



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose
 
(...) I think he was discounting tourist roads. I don't think any non tourist US road uses steam in revenue service on a regular basis (unless you count fireless). (...) You're going to need to provide a cite and detailed analysis for that. ACE (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose
 
(...) Hardly. So what...it costs more than diesel for maintance, and since US railways are profit orented, that's what they use (well, for the most part...I could name a few US railways that use steam, although I cannot think of any which are (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

4 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR