| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > > It may be an interesting exercise to propose a set that don't focus on
> > > particular people.
> >
> > I agree. But am I being paranoid in thinking you are aiming these at a
> > particular person?
>
> Yes. These are all good rules as far as I am concerned. They're not aimed at
> you, they're aimed at bad behaviours. Love the sinner, hate the sin.
>
> But do go ahead and post some proposed rules too, you can direct them at
> things you (and others) find annoying in others just as I did. If they're
> good rules they can be adopted.
No. It will end in bickering.
>
> > *sigh* Try to be constructive.
>
> Don't need to "try", because I *am* being constructive.
I don't agree with you on that.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: rules
|
| (...) Yes. These are all good rules as far as I am concerned. They're not aimed at you, they're aimed at bad behaviours. Love the sinner, hate the sin. But do go ahead and post some proposed rules too, you can direct them at things you (and others) (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
