Subject:
|
Re: A modest proposal from a modest person
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 21:13:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
979 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> As more of an aside, anyone familiar with perlmonks? They've developed quite
> a good system for behavior that's rather similar. Each member gets to vote
> on posts (nodes) in terms of how good/bad they are. Rather similar to what
> we tried here with the rating system. Differences being that:
>
> 1. Each user only has a certain number of votes per day, so you can't go
> downvote *everything* by another user.
>
> 2. Getting downvoted will occasionally affect the *person's* ranking--
> random chance. Also, voting may positively affect a person's ranking (random
> chance-- 1 in 4 chance I think?)
The person who posted or the person who is ranking?
> 3. The higher the *person's* rank, the more votes they get per day.
>
> 4. If a post gets downvoted enough, it gets reaped. I'm still not entirely
> clear on how that part works, but it's to that effect.
How does this differ from Slashdot ratings (which I admit I have not closely
perused the mechanics of)??? It sounds kind of similar.
> Dave!, DaveL, DaveE, or Dave Johann, depending on the week?
Unless you can find some other Dave, yes.
> (1 out of 4 Dave's has a spiffy little sig!)
One out of 4 Dave's <blank> has a spiffy little sig, I think.
> What does the job pay?
Nothing, but you're guaranteed at least a 20% raise each year.
> How many grey tiles
> would I get?
No, that's how many gray HAIRS would you get...
++Lar
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A modest proposal from a modest person
|
| (...) Slashdot uses a system called "karma", and it is described in a little detail here (URL) it seems to work pretty well, but it's a fairly complex system - and the hassle involved in implementation may be more trouble than it's worth for a (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A modest proposal from a modest person
|
| (...) It's really a rather good idea actually... A good bend on the original proposal, though as usual it's the implimentation that's difficult. As more of an aside, anyone familiar with perlmonks? They've developed quite a good system for behavior (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
