Subject:
|
Re: A modest proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:00:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
936 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> I'll forego replying to ANY post of Scott's, relevant or not, if everyone
> else does too...
Pencil out the "relevant or not" and change "ANY" to "any irrelevant", and
it's a done deal. From my perspective. But just because you abused your
privalages doesn't mean we should all suffer for it. The only reason I don't
think everyone should be prevented from replying to ANYTHING is because we
aren't repeat offenders. I've had 2 o-t-debate dialogues with Scott in as
many years, present situation included. You seem to have one every month or
two. I think you need the discipline more than us.
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A modest proposal
|
| (...) Who judges relevancy? Scott thinks every one of his posts is relevant, presumably. No, this is a better proposal because it removes human error. (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | A modest proposal
|
| (...) I'll give you a different proposal... I'll forego replying to ANY post of Scott's, relevant or not, if everyone else does too... and I'll hew to that just as long as everyone else can hold out too. As soon as some regular slips up, (we'll (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
