Subject:
|
A modest proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 18:32:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
942 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Low writes:
> How about 1a. Ban both of them from replying to each other (at least as a
> trial measure)?
I'll give you a different proposal...
I'll forego replying to ANY post of Scott's, relevant or not, if everyone
else does too... and I'll hew to that just as long as everyone else can hold
out too. As soon as some regular slips up, (we'll ignore wanderers who
reply) it's over. That takes what Scott does completely out of the equation.
(ever play "break the seal"?? This was a gimmick at college bars I went to
while in college. Pay a very cheap fee at the door. Drink beer, as much beer
as you can, no further charge, until someone goes to the loo. At that point
it's back to paying for beer again. This is nothing like that).
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A modest proposal
|
| (...) Pencil out the "relevant or not" and change "ANY" to "any irrelevant", and it's a done deal. From my perspective. But just because you abused your privalages doesn't mean we should all suffer for it. The only reason I don't think everyone (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Larry's behaviour
|
| (...) How about 1a. Ban both of them from replying to each other (at least as a trial measure)? Or, at least, a moratorium on the codependent "he's a liar, he's a squirmer" drivel... --DaveL (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
