Subject:
|
What, no answer? (Put three libertarians together in a room...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:50:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
280 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> Larry,
> 5 Points on this
> 1) A point of integrity : I think the description you give of who was
> intended to take part in the survey is misleading (I base this on the link
> you give).
What, no answer?
>
> 2) A point of integrity : You describe the survey as "totally unscientific".
> I am not sure what you mean by that, but I have to wonder why you have
> treated us to a 750 word post based on an unscientific online poll data,
> whilst you reject UN data as being specious?
What, no answer?
>
> 3) A point of integrity : Do you agree that it is a little strange that
> whilst the survey is "unscientific", opinion is quoted down to 1/10 of a
> percent? I'm sure that the margin of reliability was far higher than that?
What, no answer?
> 4) A general query : Why did the LP bother with this “unscientific” poll.
> Are the issues not important enough to warrant a decent attempt? Perhaps
> they were rushing to get on the 911 band-wagon? What do you think?
What, no answer?
> 5) A general query : Given that the LP has had is views on race questioned
> both here & on FreeRepublic.com in the past few days, do you agree that a
> poll of the view of the party membership on that issue not be more
> “interesting”? Perhaps it would help silence the concerns on non-LP members?
What, no answer?
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
