Subject:
|
Re: Larry's behaviour
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:30:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1067 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> The only reason anyone else cares is that we're tired of
> seeing useless name calling cluttering o-t-debate, and want to read the
> worthwhile stuff.
Ban one of us. Do the poll I suggested. I have my preference as to which,
but would support a democratic outcome either way. I have my honor, too, so
would abide without a need for administrative intervention to enforce it.
And then, once that ban is in place, come down harder on people, whoever
they are, that post debate things in non debate places or who start trouble
in non debate places.
But I dispute that calling Scott a liar is "useless", and I dispute that
calling Scott a troublemaker is "useless". For those assertions are true and
he's disruptive.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Larry's behaviour
|
| (...) As I'm sure you'd expect, I don't think the poll would be done as proposed. I think it's an all-or-nothing type deal. I think given the choices, I'd rank them as: 1. Ban neither of you 2. Ban both of you 3. Ban Scott 4. Ban Larry If I were (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Larry's behaviour
|
| (...) That's not what I asked. I *KNOW* you think he should apoligaise. I *KNOW* why *YOU'RE* doing it. You're way too proud to bother giving it up. You're addicted to the idea that you'll win. But that's not what I asked. I asked why is it better (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
