To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14039
14038  |  14040
Subject: 
Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:51:44 GMT
Viewed: 
517 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
Everything I have ever read about WWII Japanese suggests that there was
pretty strong belief that they would likely have fought bitterly to the
end had something overwhelming happened to make the entire populace
recognize that further fighting was futile.

Well-- two things. First off, you may be quite right-- I don't really know
what our mentality was at the time. Perhaps that was the best information we
had available, which would mean that an A-bomb hit MAY have been the only
way to show that to the populace. However, after the 1st one didn't work, I
certainly don't think a 2nd attempt was doing much to change things. But
either way, I still don't think *both* bombs were necessary. I'm more of the
mind to say that we should have waited longer to see what would happen.
After all, Stalin had just joined in the picture, and with the world focused
on it, I would have held out before attacking major civilian areas.

2ndly, (which is less important to this particular argument, but I want to
address nevertheless) doesn't your above statement make the bombings acts of
terrorism? I mean, maybe you'd argue that it was *justified* terrorism, but
isn't it terrorism nonetheless?

I think I would agree that using extremely unnecessary force in war is
terrorism, or at least something very similar. The debate then centers
on whether the force used was extremely unnecessary.

Ooops. Ok, it looks like you answered that 2nd part...

I think a decisive end to the war was necessary so that we
would have the willpower to do the rebuilding, and so that the Japanese
civilians would accept that their emperor was wrong so they would accept
our rebuilding efforts.

Well-- didn't the emperor more or less admit he was wrong by surrendering
unconditionally? Or does that only prove that he was right to surrender? I
dunno.

A demonstration of the bomb would not have accomplished a decisive
victory. The Japanese civilians would have seen nothing about it. Sure
the government might have accepted the destructive capability, but would
they have unconditionally surrendered?

Well, considering that it wasn't the people who surrendered, but the
emperor, under pressure from his advisors, isn't that all that counted, in
retrospect? I understand that the above may have been logic at the time, and
is therefore relevant to a moral judgement, but I would argue that in
actuality, the people's reaction was not necessary to a decision to surrender.

DaveE



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
 
(...) Just some minor picking while I try to think about that hole. (...) Dan's referenced site makes the case that it wasn't a "drop one, then decide to drop the other" plan. Both were dropped as part of the same plan, so you should take issue with (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
 
(...) It tends to be obscure, but there was never a decision to drop Bomb 1, a pause, and then a decision to drop Bomb 2. The decision was made to drop two bombs. Were both bombs necessary? Maybe not - they may have eventually surrendered anyway (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
 
(...) Everything I have ever read about WWII Japanese suggests that there was pretty strong belief that they would likely have fought bitterly to the end had something overwhelming happened to make the entire populace recognize that further fighting (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR