 | | Reading comprehension problems. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Satisfied or not, that's all the apology you get. (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | He still doesn't have the humility to admit when he's wrong. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | Larry, that was not an apology - that was more insults. More mud. More of your low level of debate. I shall ask you again. Give an example of were I have lied. I challenge you. Do it, or apologise. Put up, or shut up. All I am asking is that you (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: He still doesn't have the humility to admit when he's wrong. —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) No, but this isn't the place to ask. Larry's stated very clearly his position. Please sort it out privately with him. If after that Larry sees any reason to apologise, he can do that here, but this is not the place for your private feud. ROSCO (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: He still doesn't have the humility to admit when he's wrong. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) I think it is. This is where he made the unsubstantiated allegation. This is where he should substantiate it or apologise. I could call you “pond slime” here publicly, and then e-mail a quick note to say sorry. Would that suffice for you? (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: He still doesn't have the humility to admit when he's wrong. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Thank you. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
