| |
Larry:
> > > But please provide a cite where I said I
> > > supported that bombing (or any other bombing by the US for that matter), if
> > > you would...
Scott:
> > Did I say you did?
Scott:
> Perhaps *I* did not, but *you* did say this:
> "I would indeed *like* this to be a real war (...), because I see one as
> needful"?
>
> Did you mean a war without bombs? What did you plan?
"Silence is a virtue in those who are deficient in understanding."
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bouhours
|
| (...) So why do *you* talk so much, then? :-) Your deficiencies boggle the mind. I believe I've answered this question of yours in other posts. But I will restate it for you since you seem to insist on repeating questions ad nauseum until the answer (...) (23 years ago, 11-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Thank you, Britain.
|
| (...) Well can you? Over the weekend that has been used as an example of how things can go wrong. Can you justify your words? (...) Perhaps *I* did not, but *you* did say this: "I would indeed *like* this to be a real war (...) , because I see one (...) (23 years ago, 7-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
