Subject:
|
Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:45:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
828 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ed "Boxer" Jones writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> > > The largest fault of Larry's is probably his occasionally quick-to-judge
> > attitude towards points he feels he's already addressed. Sometimes Scott
> > (for example) will have a perfectly valid point and Larry will gloss over it
> > calling it a non-issue without giving it a 2nd thought. It doesn't happen
> > often, but it happens.
>
> I'd disagree on this one. I'd say his largest fault is his tendency to
> attack a person's stature rather than defend his position or respond to
> theirs. The title of this sub-thread is a case in point. He has done the
> same to others and me.
Ah-- a good summary point I'd missed. Perhaps a "Plays Well" category in
which Larry gets a rather low score. Each, actually, but perhaps moreso
Larry as he's often been the one to bring issues like this into the
limelight as actual topics of debate. I think I've seen more calls from
Larry to actually "do something" about Scott than I have from Scott asking
to "do something" (aka "prove something") about Larry. But I've definitely
noticed such behavior from both of them as well as some others. The degree
of name calling certainly is excessive oftimes.
> Raising the stakes to $.04
$.04 and climbing,
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
|
| (...) I'd disagree on this one. I'd say his largest fault is his tendency to attack a person's stature rather than defend his position or respond to theirs. The title of this sub-thread is a case in point. He has done the same to others and me. (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
