To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1375
1374  |  1376
Subject: 
Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 5 Jul 1999 15:06:30 GMT
Reply-To: 
(lpieniazek@)spamless(novera.com)
Viewed: 
1010 times
  
Richard Dee wrote:

I do not have these federalist papers to which you refer, so
must trust your *interpretation* of them. Assuming a copy
exists on the 'net, I shall read them. (Open invitation for
someone to e-mail me a copy of them, text-format, zipped, blah, blah).

It does. A quick search will turn it up online. I shan't provide the
free good of doing your research for you in this case. I went out and
bought a copy in the bookstore because I wanted to be able to read it on
the plane. Note that the papers themselves are in the public domain at
this point, but the most popular edition has commentary and is therefore
copyrighted.

You should therefore be opposed to government-funded and -run
innoculation programs, which have helped to protect *your*
children from many diseases, as well as others'.

Your wish is granted. I am opposed. They're a free good, after all.

And by
innoculating the masses, have further helped to protect
your children.

Please show that this benefit can only be provided by having the
innoculation free. Certainly you're not going to allege that we could
not require everyone to get these, and pay for them themselves (with
those totally without funds getting it added to their back taxes they
need to work off)?

However I dispute that 100% innoculation is required, or morally
justified. My sister-in-law, damnfool that she is, refused on moral
ground. Her kids and mine mix, and they may well die from diseases mie
are immmune to and spread to them. Oh well.

Or would you leave that, too, to
ability to pay and merit of position? (Class-based, non-
democratic, etc.) --

Please elaborate, I don't follow. How is merit "class-based" or
non-democratic?. We have equality of opportunity, or did, here.

--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com  http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.

NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
(...) Mind posting the ISBN (if you have it handy) or title of the edition you bought? I'd like to pick it up myself and the first 4 versions I've checked out on Amazon do not appear to have much in the form of commentary. (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999 15:06:30 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) Requested on the off-chance someone had them? I do have a fair few documents from wiretap.spies or whatever it was called, I downloaded almost everything (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
On Sat, 3 Jul 1999 20:56:01 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) I do not have these federalist papers to which you refer, so must trust your *interpretation* of them. Assuming a copy exists on the 'net, I shall read (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR