Subject:
|
Can Larry Justify These Ones? Let's see!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 17:23:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
696 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > > > What about the "evidence" the USA had when it bombed Sudan?
> > >
> > > I'm not convinced that we didn't get snookered on that, and that it wasn't
> > > actually his plant after all.
> >
> > Can you justify this in any way?
>
> Well can you? Over the weekend that has been used as an example of how
> things can go wrong. Can you justify your words?
For the 3rd time : Can you justify this in any way?
>
> >
> > > But please provide a cite where I said I
> > > supported that bombing (or any other bombing by the US for that matter), if
> > > you would...
> >
> > Did I say you did?
>
> Perhaps *I* did not, but *you* did say this:
> "I would indeed *like* this to be a real war (...), because I see one as
> needful"?
>
> Did you mean a war without bombs? What did you plan?
Well?
Scott A
>
> Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Thank you, Britain.
|
| (...) Well can you? Over the weekend that has been used as an example of how things can go wrong. Can you justify your words? (...) Perhaps *I* did not, but *you* did say this: "I would indeed *like* this to be a real war (...) , because I see one (...) (23 years ago, 7-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
