To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13668
13667  |  13669
Subject: 
Will Larry ever answer this?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 15:34:31 GMT
Viewed: 
808 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:


That's right, answer just one issue in the *hope* you score a cheap point.


==+==
I reject that even if the sanctions actually *caused* the death of even 1
child that it's the fault of the imposers of the sanctions for the deaths.
The *fault* lies with the lawless dictator Hussein, not the US.
==+==

Do you still stand by that?

Yes.

Can you support this, or is it mere opinion. Do you think the UNICEF data
and opinion I quoted was wrong?


Do you still stand by this:
==+==
I reject that the sanctions are the REASON that children (however many)
died. The sanctions do not prevent the flow of food into the country.
==+==

Do you think sanctaions have not caused their to be less food in Iraq?


This leg has nothing to do with whether the stat is right or whether
the causality link is there.

In your opionion. But I think it shows how little you understand the
issue... in my opinion.

Scott A



Message has 1 Reply:
  Asked and answered ( was Re: Will Larry ever answer this?
 
(...) You can post and repost this as many times as you like, I've said what I wanted to say. I doubt the veracity of UN statistics but more importantly, the other two legs stand. Fault lies with the perpetrator, not the victim and not the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: War
 
(...) That's right, answer just one issue in the *hope* you score a cheap point. (...) Can you support this, or is it mere opinion. Do you think the UNICEF data and opinion I quoted was wrong? Do you still stand by this: ==+== I reject that the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

177 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR